Close

16/05/2018

Unpaid Debit Orders: The Painful Consequences

When clients experience financial stress, unpaid debit orders may occur. In a recent matter, the Ombudsman for Short-Term Insurance found in favour of an insurer for repudiating a claim due to an unpaid premium.

The client missed a premium payable by debit order due to insufficient funds in his account after he had been dismissed from work.

The advisor informed the client that a double premium would be deducted from his account the next month, and the client made sure there was enough money in his account to cover the amount.

The client called the advisor to confirm that all was in order. The advisor’s assistant contacted the insurer’s call centre and was allegedly informed that all premiums were up to date and no further payments were required.

Two weeks later, a severe thunderstorm caused R30 000 damage to the client’s home. After the client submitted his claim, the insurer informed him that his claim had been repudiated as the policy had lapsed due to non-payment of the premium.

The advisor assisted the client and appealed to the insurer. He referred to the telephonic conversation with the insurer, in which the insurer confirmed the premium had been paid. The advisor provided the time and date of the call and motivated for a reinstatement of the policy and that the claim should be paid to the client.

When the insurer declined the request and rejected the claim, the client lodged a complaint with the Ombudsman for Short-Term Insurance. The insurer informed the Ombudsman that due to technical difficulties the telephone recording could not be retrieved, and thus there was no record.

The insurer maintained it was within its rights, as the policy wording made it clear that premium payment was the sole responsibility of the insured. The wording also clearly stated that the benefits would lapse after a specified period of non-payment.

The Ombudsman duly ruled in favour of the insurer.

So, what happened?

A debit order that reflects as paid and then shows a reversal a short while later is a common occurrence that results in much debate between banks, clients and companies expecting payment. In this matter, it appears the call to the insurer to confirm payment was made in the timeframe after the payment showed as having gone through and just before it was reversed.

What happens in reality?

Many clients experience cash flow problems from time to time, as financial responsibilities and challenges occur. When a client is financially stressed, and there is not enough money in his or her bank account to cover all the debit orders, the first companies whose debit orders run through the account get paid.

If bond, cell phone and loan payments run through a transactional account, for example, banks ensure the bond payment runs first to improve the likelihood of a successful collection.

Some companies, usually microlenders and banks, use a debit order collection system called NAEDO. This system continuously scans a customer’s bank account and takes the debit order amount due when sufficient funds are available in the account. Money that gets snatched by this system cannot be reversed.

Not all insurers use the NAEDO system, so if the debit order for your premium is reversed, the insurer might not try to collect it again.

Sourced from Masthead

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.